UK - Daily Echo - Southampton

Strong fluoride objection
We protest most strongly to the fluoridation of the water being supplied in our homes and businesses and the decision of the Strategic Health Authority (SHA), to put that chemical into our water supply despite the very clear vote by the pubic who attended a meeting upon the subject, and by letters, articles and comments in the media that the majority of the public did NOT want fluoride added to the water supply
It would be so satisfying for democracy to come to the surface on this matter and for the SHA to wash their hands of it! In unfluoridated water of course.
MR & MRS ANDREW, Chandler's Ford.

Diet is the answer
I am NOT in favour of adding it to any water supply. It should be public vote to have the choice of something we all need to live. I feel there is already enough chemicals added to supply and fluoride will not cover up or take the place of bad diet. Good wholesome diet, plenty of fruit and veg and we hope good water is the answer. Leave chemicals alone. There are enough around already for our body to contend with in this modern age. C REED, Southampton.

Democracy's an illusion
YOUR campaign for a referendum on fluoridation, while admirable, has one flaw.
The Echo still believes we are a democracy!
As you report the health authority does not have to take notice of opinions when it undertakes consultation.
This is the same when objections are made at planning meetings. It is the same when the Government sets up inquiries and quangos to "advise government".
Our MPs do not take any considered decisions they just rubber stamp "independent reports" from many unelected professors and organisations.
Best of luck with your campaign but expect little result. If you do get one the SHA will be back and be looking to enforce its will at a later date.
KEITH WEBB, Chandler's Ford..