Canada - Focus on better public health
Focus on better public health
The Times
Published: Friday, April 09, 2010
Editor:
The Times ventures a cheap, irresponsible attack on parents who would rather have the conscience to put their children before pious medical officials and bureaucrats who use fear to influence the opinions and actions of others (Times March 6, Our View).
How strange, the admission that we do not know what causes autism but that is no reason for us not to say "it shows a disregard for the child and community when parents choose not to vaccinate." Whose confidence are you trying to win? So, create a strong immune system-- it is really not that difficult, what with the availability of thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol (by the way, also known as antifreeze), and many others you were never told existed.
Would you care to explain how you would feel if it just so happened that your endorsement of a mandatory vaccination program killed your child? Would such a horrific event change your mind as to the need to use these on everyone? People have a choice do they not?
Would you not hesitate to give your child what studies have for decades shown to be a contributing factor in the rise of autism--mercury (hence thimerosal), found in dental amalgams, deep-sea fish, childhood vaccines, and air emission activities such as gasoline combustion, coal burning, etc.
People should not have to be scared when they open the paper and find that they have not devoted enough of their efforts to institutionalized malpractice. If all of this seems unbelievable consider this: fluoride, the waste product from nuclear, aluminum, steel, or phosphate industries, is more cheaply distributed for use in public water supplies by tanker trucks sent out to municipalities then for the company to pay so that it may use a toxic waste dump, and yet its undisguised origins have not disqualified it from public consumption.
Focus should therefore shift to improving public health by understanding the social conditions which breed disease, rather than on eradicating diseases. After all, the decline in infectious diseases reflects improved hygiene, sanitation, nutrition, and living standards.
Damian Fajenski,
Sardis
The Times
Published: Friday, April 09, 2010
Editor:
The Times ventures a cheap, irresponsible attack on parents who would rather have the conscience to put their children before pious medical officials and bureaucrats who use fear to influence the opinions and actions of others (Times March 6, Our View).
How strange, the admission that we do not know what causes autism but that is no reason for us not to say "it shows a disregard for the child and community when parents choose not to vaccinate." Whose confidence are you trying to win? So, create a strong immune system-- it is really not that difficult, what with the availability of thimerosal, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol (by the way, also known as antifreeze), and many others you were never told existed.
Would you care to explain how you would feel if it just so happened that your endorsement of a mandatory vaccination program killed your child? Would such a horrific event change your mind as to the need to use these on everyone? People have a choice do they not?
Would you not hesitate to give your child what studies have for decades shown to be a contributing factor in the rise of autism--mercury (hence thimerosal), found in dental amalgams, deep-sea fish, childhood vaccines, and air emission activities such as gasoline combustion, coal burning, etc.
People should not have to be scared when they open the paper and find that they have not devoted enough of their efforts to institutionalized malpractice. If all of this seems unbelievable consider this: fluoride, the waste product from nuclear, aluminum, steel, or phosphate industries, is more cheaply distributed for use in public water supplies by tanker trucks sent out to municipalities then for the company to pay so that it may use a toxic waste dump, and yet its undisguised origins have not disqualified it from public consumption.
Focus should therefore shift to improving public health by understanding the social conditions which breed disease, rather than on eradicating diseases. After all, the decline in infectious diseases reflects improved hygiene, sanitation, nutrition, and living standards.
Damian Fajenski,
Sardis
posted by Bill at
10:15 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home